Chromecast vs. Apple TV vs. Roku vs. Amazon Fire TV
If you're looking to buy a media-streaming box, it's likely you'll end up choosing between three types: Chromecast, Roku and Apple TV. If you're a frequent Amazon.com visitor, there may be a fourth option intruding into your thoughts:Fire TV. And if you happen to be a hard-core Google fan, you might be considering the Google Nexus Player and Android TV. Related storiesFire TV Stick vs. Chromecast vs. Roku Streaming Stick: Measuring the sticksRoku 3 reviewApple TV (2012) reviewGoogle Chromecast reviewAmazon Fire TV reviewGoogle Nexus Player review These five aren't the only streamers on the market, but they'rethe most popular and for good reason -- they all cost under $100 and offer a lot of value for your money. Whichever one you buy, chances are you'll use it all the time.Simple answer: Just buy the Roku 3 The Roku platform remains our favorite of the bunch, and the best Roku, theRoku 3, won a CNET Editors' Choice Award.Despite being released in March 2013, it still delivers a better overall experience than any of the other boxes or sticks, with the most apps and the best search, as well as a lightning-quick interface.That said, it's not necessarily the best choice for every buyer. Cheaper Rokus are nearly as good, and the Google Chromecast and Apple TV are compelling alternatives. The boxes from Amazon and Google are the newest and have some intriguing capabilities, but among this group we're less likely to recommend them. Then there's the $39 Amazon Fire TV stick, which we really like for the price -- albeit not as much as Roku's stick. So which media streamer is right for you? Let's take a closer look at all of the options. But first, if you're looking for a more granular comparison of the$35-$50 streaming sticks, check out Measuring the Sticks. And if you just want to compare support for major apps, skip down to the chart below.Roku ($50-100) Sarah Tew/CNETWhy it's great: More choice of devices, more apps Multiple hardware and pricing options: CurrentlyRoku has four different players, not counting Roku TV. If I could recommend only one, it would be the flagship Roku 3 ($100). But Roku also has cheaper options: the Roku 2 ($70), the Roku 1 ($50) and the Streaming Stick ($50).Each has its advantages and disadvantages, which I cover in depth in "Which Roku streamer should you buy?" Over 1,700 apps: Roku is the undisputed winner when it comes to content (see the chart below), with a massive channel library that includes Netflix, Amazon Instant, HBO Go, Hulu Plus, Pandora, Spotify, Rdio, MLB.TV, NFL Now, Amazon Cloud Player, Vudu, PBS, TWC TV and, yes, YouTube. Roku is often the first to get new channels, plus the company has a good track record of bringing updates to its boxes and apps. In the latest example, it added Google Play Movies and TV almost the same day the Nexus Player launched.On December 16, 2014, Comcast lifted its long-standing ban on HBO Go and Showtime Anytime, finally allowing Roku to stream the apps to its subscribers. Headphone jack in the remote: Plug headphones into the remote (for the Roku 3 and Roku 2 only) and you can listen to whatever you're streaming, while it automatically mutes your TV so nobody else in the room is bothered. It's a truly killer feature, especially for late-night viewing. Blazing-fast: The Roku 3 has the fastest chip of any of Roku's boxes and it shows, making it feel more responsive than any other streaming box I've used, including the newer Amazon Fire TV. The other Rokus are slower than Roku 3, but still plenty speedy.Best-in-class cross-platform search: No other device in this group offers the ability to search for a title or other keyword across so many services, including Netflix, Hulu Plus, Amazon Instant, HBO Go, Vudu, Crackle, M-Go and Blockbuster On Demand. Roku's search can also save you money by letting you know when you can avoid paying to rent a movie or show that might be available for "free" as part of a subscription. You can also search via voice using Roku's remote app for iOS and Android. Sarah Tew/CNET Content-agnostic: Roku's interface doesn't push you toward one app or service. The platform has a refreshing "come one, come all" vibe that seems more customer-friendly than Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV or Android TV, which all more or less push you toward the hardware makers' own content. One manifestation of this egalitarianism is that you can move any of the same-sized app tiles in its main interface to any position.Why it's not perfect: Weak mirroring and gamingNo true AirPlay / Google Cast mirroring equivalent: Both Apple TV and Chromecast let you use native apps on your smartphone, tablet or computer to push content to your streaming box. Sometimes it's easier to use a smartphone than a remote, and mirroring can access services that don't have a dedicated app. Roku is starting to offer some of this functionality -- YouTube and Netflix are currently supported, plus you can push photos, music and videos stored on your phone -- but it's not nearly as widely adopted as on the other boxes. The company also added screen mirroring to the Roku 3 and Streaming Stick, but it's a beta feature that only works with recent Android devices, Windows 8.1 and Windows Phone.See our How To for details. Sparse gaming support: Compared with Android TV, Fire TV and even Chromecast, Roku's selection of games is pretty weak. But hey, it's better than Apple TV's.Google Chromecast ($35) Sarah Tew/CNETWhy it's great: Cheap, simple and small $35 is tough to beat: There's something about the magic price of $35 that makes this the perfect impulse buy. Even if you only end up using it a handful of times, you'll feel like you got your money's worth. And Google seems committed to continuing to offer regular updates to the popular dongle. Stick form is "not a box": All of the pucklike boxes are compact, but the Chromecast is a stickler for small. The dongle hides behind your TV, although it does need power either from your TV's USB port or the included power adapter. Of course, the $40 Fire TV Stick and the $50 Roku Streaming stick offer the same design and include an actual remote. Major apps covered, catalog growing: Since its launch with just Netflix and YouTube, app selection continues to balloon. Chromecast now also works with HBO Go, Showtime Anytime, Starz Play, Hulu Plus, Pandora, Google Music, Plex, Vevo, MLB TV, Crackle, Rdio, Vudu and numerous other apps. The ease of adding "Cast" support to pretty much any existing Android or iOS app has also helped the Chromecast library expand very quickly recently.Why it's not perfect: No true TV interface or remote No onscreen user interface or standard remote: By design, the Chromecast doesn't have a true TV-based user interface. Everything is controlled through your smartphone or tablet, which means you may need to unlock your device every time you want to pause or rewind. The other boxes offer apps for smartphone/tablet control if you'd like, but the Chromecast can only be controlled one way. For the living room, I personally prefer real buttons over virtual ones, especially when combined with a universal remote, but it's somewhat a matter of preference. App selection could still be better: An increasing number of apps offer Cast support, but there are still some significant holes, including Amazon Instant, Vimeo,Spotify and numerous sports apps. Google's open Software Development Kit (SDK) means more apps get updated with the Cast feature all the time, but it will still be a while before it catches up to Roku. In the meantime "unofficial" apps like "Filmeo HD for Vimeo" and "Spoticast" help ease the pain. No cross-platform search: There's no equivalent of Roku's (or Amazon's, or Google's) search capability with Chromecast. While some third-party apps offer similar functionality, I haven't found any that are quite as easy to use as Roku's integrated search. Screen mirroring can be spotty: Screen mirroring or "TabCasting" is a beta feature on the Chromecast and it shows. While being able to project any content from a Chrome tab to your TV sounds great, in reality it doesn't always work well, especially compared with a similar screen-mirroring feature available on the Apple TV and recent Mac laptops. You can TabCast Amazon Instant, for example, but the quality is worse and dropouts common in our experience.Apple TV ($99) Sarah Tew/CNETWhy it's great: An excellent iOS companion It 'just works' in the Apple ecosystem: If you own a lot of music, movies or TV shows on iTunes, the Apple TV lets you access all that content on your TV and connected sound system. And if you use iTunes Match, all your cloud-stored music is available as well. iTunes Radio gives you a free radio option in your living room too. AirPlay mirroring is just awesome: If you have other iOS devices like an iPhone or iPad, or a relatively recent Mac computer, it's dead simple to push music, photos and videos from nearly any app to your Apple TV. It also gives you access to a lot of apps that aren't supported natively by the Apple TV. For example, there's no Pandora app on the box, but it's easy to stream Pandora from an iPhone or iPad. The same goes for Vudu, Plex and SlingPlayer, to name a few. AirPlay also works with web pages, providing access to video-heavy sites like ComedyCentral.com. Catching up with apps: The Apple TV used to get a lot of flak for its limited app support, but it's done a much better job recently, adding high-quality services like HBO Go and Watch ESPN. Aside from Amazon Instant, pretty much every major video app is now available on Apple TV.Why it's not perfect: Showing its age Fewer apps and features than Roku: Roku has (a lot) more apps and a remote with a headphone jack. Those are significant differences, especially when the Roku 3 costs the same amount. No games or cross-platform search: Even Roku's paltry game selection is better than Apple TV's, which has no games at all. Even if you don't care about playing games on your streaming device, you might miss the option to search across different apps for content. Very iTunes-centric: Although it's not as pushy as Amazon or Android TV, the Apple TV interface is still designed to steer you toward iTunes content, with a home screen topped by iTunes movies, TV shows and music. That's not a problem if you're all-in with the Apple ecosystem, but it's not ideal if you prefer to rent and buy content from other online stores, like Amazon or Vudu (neither of which have apps on Apple TV). New model coming soon? One final thing to consider: there's a lot of speculation that Apple may release a new Apple TV soon. Those rumors have certainly circulated before, but considering how old the current Apple TV hardware is, I would be surprised if we didn't see a new box in 2015, perhaps in partnership with a cable company.Amazon Fire TV ($39-99) Sarah Tew/CNET Why it's great: Amazin' for Amazon Choice of stick or box: The newest streaming device here, the Amazon Fire TV Stick, costs just $39. It offers almost all of the functionality of the $99 box, making it one of the best values available in streaming. No wonder it sold out almost immediately, and is difficult to find during the 2014 holiday season. Loads Amazon video content faster: The Fire TV box and stick are both plenty speedy, but the "ASAP" feature--available only with Amazon Instant and Prime videos -- takes fast to another level. Movies and TV shows start almost immediately after selecting them, far faster than any other streamer. The same goes for fast-forwarding and rewinding videos, which can often be clunky on streaming devices. Voice search that actually works: Like the Nexus Player, the Fire TV offers the ability to search by speaking into the remote (with the Fire TV Stick that voice-capable remote is a $30 option, but you can still voice search via the app). Unlike most such features it actually worked well in our tests, so much so that you might actually use it. Since launch Amazon has enabled voice search across numerous other apps too, including Hulu Plus, HBO Go and Showtime Anytime, although results from Netflix are still conspicuously absent. Sarah Tew/CNET The best gaming support: Amazon's Fire TV store is loaded with games that were originally designed for phones and tablets, and both the Fire TV box and the stick allow you to play them on the big screen (the box supports more games than the stick). If you give two shakes about this feature, which far outstrips most other streamers' gaming support, you'll want to invest $40 in the optional controller. The exception is Android TV with the Nexus Player, which also offers robust game support and an optional controller.Why it's not perfect: Pushy interface, fewer apps Pushes Amazon content down your throat: More so than Apple TV with iTunes, the Fire TV puts Amazon Instant video front and center all the time. Many of the menu options (movies, TV, watch list, video library, music) show only Amazon content and the home screen has a large section promoting shows recently added to Amazon Prime Instant. The home screen also doesn't allow you to pin your favorite apps, such as Netflix, for easier access, although the Recent menu helps. Lags behind in apps: Roku and Apple have Fire TV soundly beat in the app arena, and even Chromecast offers more apps. Music app support beyond Amazon music is pretty weak too. That said, the Fire TV platform took a major step forward in December 2015 when Amazon made good on its promise to add HBO Go. The downside? It won't be available on the Stick until Spring 2015.And despite reaching a deal with Roku, Comcast still doesn't allow HBO Go and Showtime Anytime streaming to Fire TV for its subscribers. Neither does Charter.Google Nexus Player ($99) Sarah Tew/CNETWhy it's great: The best voice search, Android openness Conversational voice search: The company behind Google Now gets voice search, and the Nexus Player does it better than even the Fire TV. Not only will it return results for titles and actors, but it can handle complex queries like "Science fiction new releases" with aplomb. Combines traditional native apps and casting: Like the innovative Chromecast, the Nexus player is compatible with Google's Cast service in addition to its (for now tiny) selection of native apps. It also works with TabCast from a Chrome browser and Android phone screen mirroring. Gaming and the potential of Google Play: At launch the Fire TV offers more games, but Android TV and the Nexus Player's selection is a close second, and far outpaces the others. If developers and Google open up more games and apps currently available on the Play store, it will get even better.Why it's not perfect: Pushes Google content, paltry native app selection Tied too closely to unpopular Google Play Movies and TV: With the current Android TV interface on the Nexus Player, Google is even more obnoxious than Apple and Amazon about force-feeding users its own content. Compared with those two ecosystems, the Google Play video service lags far behind in popularity. Voice search only works with Google services: Sure, it works great, but for now voice search only finds results from Google and YouTube. Google says the selection of searchable apps will expand eventually. The smallest selection of native apps: It's early days yet, but so far Android TV had fewer native apps (as opposed to Cast-compatible apps) than any of the other platforms. Since launch only MLB TV and NBA Game Time have been added as major native apps.No Ethernet: All of the other $99 boxes offer a wired Ethernet port, which is great if you don't have reliable Wi-Fi near your TV. The Nexus Player (like the sticks) is Wi-Fi-only. Sarah Tew/CNETThe good news: They're all pretty good All of these streaming devices are capable and affordable, which is one reason they all received at least a "Good" rating in our reviews. A die-hard iOS user can get a lot of functionality out of the Google Chromecast, and an Android fan can get a lot out of an Apple TV. As of now, the Roku 3 is still the best option for most buyers, but it's a quickly evolving space, as the Chromecast, Nexus Player and Amazon Fire TV continue to add more apps, and the rumors intensify about a newer, better Apple TV. Sarah Tew/CNET The Chart: Major apps compared RokuApple TVAmazon Fire TVGoogle ChromecastGoogle Nexus PlayerNetflixYesYesYesCastYesAmazon InstantYesAirPlayYesTabCastTabCastYouTubeYesYesYesCastYesHulu PlusYesYesYesCastYesHBO GoYesYesYes*CastCastShowtime AnytimeYesYesYesCastCastVuduYesAirPlayNoCastCastFlixsterYesYesYesCastCastCrackleYesYesYesCastYesPBSYesYesYesTabCastTabCastPBS KidsYesYesYesCastYesFXNowYesYesNoNoNoDisney ChannelsYesYesYesTabCastTabCastTime Warner Cable TVYesNoNoNoNoSlingPlayerYesAirPlayNoCastCastSky NewsYesYesYesNoNoStarz PlayNoNoNoCastCastBloomberg TVNoYesYesCastYesWatch ESPNYesYesYesCastCastMLB.TVYesYesYesCastYesNFL NowYesYesYesCastCastNBA Game TimeYesYesYesCastYesPandoraYesAirPlayYesCastYesSpotifyYesAirPlayYesTabCastTabCastRdioYesAirPlayNoCastCastBeats MusicNoYesNoNoNoRhapsodyNoAirPlayNoCastCastVevoYesYesYesCastCast"Radio" & iTunes radioNoYesNoNoNoTuneInYesAirPlayYesTabCastTabCastiHeartRadioYesAirPlayYesCastCastAmazon MusicYesAirPlayYesNoNoiTunes contentNoYesNoNoNoGoogle MusicNoNoNoCastYesGoogle Play Movies and TVYesNoNoCastYesPlexYesAirPlayYesCastYes*HBO Go is available now on the Fire TV box, but not coming to the stick until Spring 2015. Other chart Notes: Apps were selected based on editorial discretion. All of these devices support additional apps beyond those listed here. "Yes" means the device supports the app natively; "AirPlay," "Cast" and "TabCast" mean the device supports the app using that mirroring function instead of natively; "No" means the device does not currently have the app or did not fully support it via mirroring in our tests. The list applies only to the U.S. market; app selection varies in other countries worldwide. App selection is current as of December 19, 2014.
Report- Apple using Nuance voice tech in data center
Report: Apple using Nuance voice tech in data center
The goings-on within Apple's new North Carolina data center remain largely unknown, though a new report suggests Apple is using at least part of the facilities to power an enhanced voice services platform that will be unveiled early next month.In a report this afternoon, TechCrunch claims that Apple is running voice software, and "possibly" even hardware from communications company Nuance in its data center. The end result is said to be improved voice technologies in the next major version of Apple's iOS, which is expected to be unveiled at next month's Worldwide Developers Conference. Burlington, Mass.-based Nuance is the maker of Dragon NaturallySpeaking speech recognition software, as well as Nuance Recognizer, a recognition tool for businesses that the company claims is the industry leader in recognition accuracy. Nuance has four voice-powered apps on Apple's platform, including one that lets users do speech to text dictation to send out as social-networking status updates. During an interview last November, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak incorrectly let loose that Apple acquired Nuance, before correcting the mention in a follow-up interview. As Reuters noted at the time, an acquisition by Apple would mean competitors who were using Nuance's technology would drop it and go elsewhere, potentially giving Apple a competitive edge, though squashing Nuance as a business. Citing an anonymous source, TechCrunch adds that on the road to making the deal with Nuance, Microsoft was "pushing" Apple to use its own voice recognition technology in iOS. "That attempt was rebuffed, apparently," the outlet said. Microsoft uses its own speech recognition services, which are powered by TellMe (a company Microsoft acquired in 2007), in its Windows Phone 7 OS. Apple's had speech recognition and voice control in iOS since the iPhone 3GS. Since then, it's been expanded onto the iPod Touch, though not the iPad. Apple's current implementation has users searching for songs, contacts, and managing music playback controls using their voice, but over the years the feature set has remained unchanged. By comparison, competitor Google has built voice-powered Web search, application launching, and transcription tools into its Android OS. Seven months prior to the Wozniak incident, Apple had purchased virtual assistant tool Siri. A report from March (also from TechCrunch) said that Apple was currently in the middle of "deeply integrating" the voice technology from that acquisition into iOS in an attempt to make a voice platform for developers to build voice recognition tools into their games and apps. During Apple's annual shareholders meeting earlier this year, the company said its North Carolina data center was on track to go live in the "spring" and would be used to support its iTunes and MobileMe services. The expectations remains that Apple will bolster both of those efforts to offer features like a storage locker for music and an enhanced suite of Web apps and services.
The goings-on within Apple's new North Carolina data center remain largely unknown, though a new report suggests Apple is using at least part of the facilities to power an enhanced voice services platform that will be unveiled early next month.In a report this afternoon, TechCrunch claims that Apple is running voice software, and "possibly" even hardware from communications company Nuance in its data center. The end result is said to be improved voice technologies in the next major version of Apple's iOS, which is expected to be unveiled at next month's Worldwide Developers Conference. Burlington, Mass.-based Nuance is the maker of Dragon NaturallySpeaking speech recognition software, as well as Nuance Recognizer, a recognition tool for businesses that the company claims is the industry leader in recognition accuracy. Nuance has four voice-powered apps on Apple's platform, including one that lets users do speech to text dictation to send out as social-networking status updates. During an interview last November, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak incorrectly let loose that Apple acquired Nuance, before correcting the mention in a follow-up interview. As Reuters noted at the time, an acquisition by Apple would mean competitors who were using Nuance's technology would drop it and go elsewhere, potentially giving Apple a competitive edge, though squashing Nuance as a business. Citing an anonymous source, TechCrunch adds that on the road to making the deal with Nuance, Microsoft was "pushing" Apple to use its own voice recognition technology in iOS. "That attempt was rebuffed, apparently," the outlet said. Microsoft uses its own speech recognition services, which are powered by TellMe (a company Microsoft acquired in 2007), in its Windows Phone 7 OS. Apple's had speech recognition and voice control in iOS since the iPhone 3GS. Since then, it's been expanded onto the iPod Touch, though not the iPad. Apple's current implementation has users searching for songs, contacts, and managing music playback controls using their voice, but over the years the feature set has remained unchanged. By comparison, competitor Google has built voice-powered Web search, application launching, and transcription tools into its Android OS. Seven months prior to the Wozniak incident, Apple had purchased virtual assistant tool Siri. A report from March (also from TechCrunch) said that Apple was currently in the middle of "deeply integrating" the voice technology from that acquisition into iOS in an attempt to make a voice platform for developers to build voice recognition tools into their games and apps. During Apple's annual shareholders meeting earlier this year, the company said its North Carolina data center was on track to go live in the "spring" and would be used to support its iTunes and MobileMe services. The expectations remains that Apple will bolster both of those efforts to offer features like a storage locker for music and an enhanced suite of Web apps and services.
Fanhattan for iOS adds HBO and Cinemax, still trying to be iPad's perfect video app
Fanhattan for iOS adds HBO and Cinemax, still trying to be iPad's perfect video app
Devices like the iPad have become spectacular as repositories for streaming TV apps and video services, but they're not so great at discovery of said streaming shows, which tend to be scattered aroundlike Easter eggs across different apps. The latest version of Fanhattan takes a small step forward in the great Mission To Help iPad Users Find Their Videos, but it's not the perfect app yet.What next-gen streaming video devices need is a better centralized search-and-discovery dashboard. The Xbox 360 has an excellent solution via Bing, where shows can be found via any of the Xbox 360's available video apps (and there are many). Fanhattan on iOS has been offering a similar functionality for a while now with an IMDb-like database of movie and TV show information and a launchpad for videos on various services like Netflix, iTunes, and Hulu Plus, but the selection of video apps that Fanhattan can access isn't quite as extensive.Screenshot by Scott SteinThe latest version of Fanhattan that's available on the App Store today adds HBO, Cinemax, NBC, and CW, showing show availability in searches and launching those apps from within Fanhattan. It's anothersmall but important step forward for the service, and helps make the app a better catch-all video search tool. Also added is a personal Watch List feature that tracks show and movie availability.Screenshot by Scott SteinThis brings the number of video services that Fanhattan can discover up to an impressive tally: Netflix, iTunes, Hulu Plus, HBO Go, PBS, YouTube, ABC/ABC Family, Cinemax, NBC, Lifetime, Crackle, and The CW. And yet, it still lacks plenty of other services: EPIX, Adult Swim, Vudu, and Amazon Instant Video (which doesn't have an iOS app, but works on the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3) to name a few.I appreciate Fanhattan, but its somewhat odd pane-based navigation still doesn't feel intuitive, and the app artificially splits TV shows and movies into two separate sections. Comparatively, the Xbox 360 with Bing feels like a true centralized launchpad, and offers up many more ways of serving pay video streams (as opposed to subscription services like Netflix and HBO Go), whereas, in the iOS ecosystem, it's iTunes or nothing for rentals (Vudu used to be listed in Fanhattan, but no longer). Fanhattan also lacks any live TV listings for said shows or movies.If you're curious to see how Fanhattan works, watch the video below. It's available for free on the App Store; it's definitely worth your time to download and check out.
Devices like the iPad have become spectacular as repositories for streaming TV apps and video services, but they're not so great at discovery of said streaming shows, which tend to be scattered aroundlike Easter eggs across different apps. The latest version of Fanhattan takes a small step forward in the great Mission To Help iPad Users Find Their Videos, but it's not the perfect app yet.What next-gen streaming video devices need is a better centralized search-and-discovery dashboard. The Xbox 360 has an excellent solution via Bing, where shows can be found via any of the Xbox 360's available video apps (and there are many). Fanhattan on iOS has been offering a similar functionality for a while now with an IMDb-like database of movie and TV show information and a launchpad for videos on various services like Netflix, iTunes, and Hulu Plus, but the selection of video apps that Fanhattan can access isn't quite as extensive.Screenshot by Scott SteinThe latest version of Fanhattan that's available on the App Store today adds HBO, Cinemax, NBC, and CW, showing show availability in searches and launching those apps from within Fanhattan. It's anothersmall but important step forward for the service, and helps make the app a better catch-all video search tool. Also added is a personal Watch List feature that tracks show and movie availability.Screenshot by Scott SteinThis brings the number of video services that Fanhattan can discover up to an impressive tally: Netflix, iTunes, Hulu Plus, HBO Go, PBS, YouTube, ABC/ABC Family, Cinemax, NBC, Lifetime, Crackle, and The CW. And yet, it still lacks plenty of other services: EPIX, Adult Swim, Vudu, and Amazon Instant Video (which doesn't have an iOS app, but works on the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3) to name a few.I appreciate Fanhattan, but its somewhat odd pane-based navigation still doesn't feel intuitive, and the app artificially splits TV shows and movies into two separate sections. Comparatively, the Xbox 360 with Bing feels like a true centralized launchpad, and offers up many more ways of serving pay video streams (as opposed to subscription services like Netflix and HBO Go), whereas, in the iOS ecosystem, it's iTunes or nothing for rentals (Vudu used to be listed in Fanhattan, but no longer). Fanhattan also lacks any live TV listings for said shows or movies.If you're curious to see how Fanhattan works, watch the video below. It's available for free on the App Store; it's definitely worth your time to download and check out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)